I am just looking for answers as I feel very disappointed with our vets but am not sure if we are being a bit harsh. Briefly:
May 2016 - brought Milly in as noticed she was eating "dirt". Immediately vet did blood test and results were alarming - PCV 15% and they couldn't understand how she seemed so "well". another test done, sent to lab - this happened a few times as the results differed widely. Sometimes the results would be 23%, sometimes 305, sometimes 15% etc. I now understand from my own research (although no vet has told me this!) that chronic IMHA readings can fluctuate in the early stages. How come my vets don't know this?? Milly seemed quite well so no medication was given. We were just about to go to referral hospital when they did find hookworm and this was treated, and her PCV rose to 33%. IMHA was then discounted.... However by October she started eating dirt again and I took her as she was due her booster. I mentioned straight away that she was eating dirt and wanted wormer. Vet took bloods as obviously realised something was amiss. However, she still vaccinated her..... This is the point of my post - 4 days later she crashed very badly and was given blood transfusion etc. Is this a coincidence? or did the booster push her from chronic to acute IMHA? Now I understand that all vaccines have a label warning - "Only vaccinate healthy dogs". Should I do something about this vet? We were not told about any potential side effects etc. and it seems very wrong to me, in hindsight, that Milly was vaccinated when it was very clear there was an issue. Should we discuss this with the seniors at the practice? I don't want to cause bad feeling but in my view, this was bad practice. Anyone have any views on this? thank you!!
May 2016 - brought Milly in as noticed she was eating "dirt". Immediately vet did blood test and results were alarming - PCV 15% and they couldn't understand how she seemed so "well". another test done, sent to lab - this happened a few times as the results differed widely. Sometimes the results would be 23%, sometimes 305, sometimes 15% etc. I now understand from my own research (although no vet has told me this!) that chronic IMHA readings can fluctuate in the early stages. How come my vets don't know this?? Milly seemed quite well so no medication was given. We were just about to go to referral hospital when they did find hookworm and this was treated, and her PCV rose to 33%. IMHA was then discounted.... However by October she started eating dirt again and I took her as she was due her booster. I mentioned straight away that she was eating dirt and wanted wormer. Vet took bloods as obviously realised something was amiss. However, she still vaccinated her..... This is the point of my post - 4 days later she crashed very badly and was given blood transfusion etc. Is this a coincidence? or did the booster push her from chronic to acute IMHA? Now I understand that all vaccines have a label warning - "Only vaccinate healthy dogs". Should I do something about this vet? We were not told about any potential side effects etc. and it seems very wrong to me, in hindsight, that Milly was vaccinated when it was very clear there was an issue. Should we discuss this with the seniors at the practice? I don't want to cause bad feeling but in my view, this was bad practice. Anyone have any views on this? thank you!!